Action Alerts
| By Kenneth Quinnell - Jun 9th, 2009 at 7:17 pm EDT |
| Also listed in: Florida Bloggers | Florida Progressive Coalition |
Send an e-mail: Act to Restore America's Everglades (Sierra)
Send an e-mail: Tell the White House: Protect Roadless Areas of National Forests (EJ)
Send an e-mail: Fire Casey -- We Need a New Top Dog in the Army! (WDFC)
Sign the petition: Stand With Sotomayor (OFA)
Sign the pledge: Sign teh Pledge for Reproductive Freedom (NOW)

Comments are closed for this post.
Solar Panels: Heavy metals , cant recycle, Short life span, expensive
Wind Turbine: Plastics - Interrupts bird migration. Environmentalists actually have fought against
Battery: Expensive. Acids: Short life span. Land Fill
Second, it's clear that the "user" has a vested interested in oil, so he's far from impartial.
Three, he's either directly lying or is falling for nonsense that people are lying to him. His description of the viability of alternate energy might have been true in the 1960s, but it's complete nonsense in the present.
Fourth, he says that he'd like to have an intellectual conversation on the topic, but is so condescending and insulting that he probably doesn't even know what an intellectual conversation would look like.
Finally, and most importantly, all scientific evidence leads one to the conclusion that further drilling in the U.S. will do nothing to reduce gas prices or solve our energy problems. The only solution that makes any sense is a diversified portfolio of primarily renewable sources, which, for the near future would have to include oil and gas. But those would be phased out as fuel sources in relatively short order. Anyone who doesn't see that is either ignorant, lying or both.